26th September 2008

My!

posted in Economy, Politics |

Well.  Weren’t they testy?  Both of them.  And both of them just sort of danced around Lehrer’s question about what–if any–fundamental changes to their plans the current financial situation may cause.

Humph.

As for the current financial situation:  I have been watching and reading, slack-jawed, for a week.  First the bailout’s on.  Then it’s off.  Then it’s on again!  Oops, nope, it’s off.  No, it’s on.  NO!  It’s off!  And the markets have sat there, waiting with bated breath, wondering:  which way is it going to go?

The congresscritters have been inundated with angry calls, faxes, emails, letters about the bailout.  A representative from Pennsylvania (Paul Kanjorski, D), says that 50% of his calls have been “No!” and the other 50% have been “Hell, no!”  And 200 big-name economists got together and signed a letter that said “No go” as well.

A lot of people are pointing to the Community Reinvestment Act as “the” spur for our current financial meltdown.  I liked this commentary from a person monickered “Mock Turtle” in a comment thread at Calculated Risk:

“in round numbers

100 million home owners

50 million have mortgages 50 million don’t (again round numbers)

25 million issued loans in last 8 years

one third of these are sub prime; 8 million

4 percent of subprime has foreclosed: 320 thousand

so are you saying that all it took was

320 thousand people failing to pay their mortgages

to bring down the financial system of the United States of America???


or was it

…way the mortgages were mixed, tranched, sliced, diced, resold, leveraged and derivitivized that brought the system to its knees

guess you gotta choose

who is more powerful

wall street

or

a bunch of wanna-be starry eyed home owner poor people”

Another commenter wrote:  “All the trillions of investments between banks turns out to just be invested in investments which were invested in other investments which were invested in other investments which were invested in a house in California or Florida by some guy who lied about his income.”

It’s a mess.  There are people saying that Bush, Bernanke and Paulson are running a scam.  My personal feeling is that they’re terrified.  There was an anecdote going around that Paulson got on bended knee to Nancy Pelosi, begging her to help pass the bailout.

So far, in September, we’ve had:  Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac bailed out…Lehman bankrupt…AIG bailed out…Washington Mutual taken over, but listed as a “failed bank” on the FDIC website…and now Wachovia Bank is looking for someone to buy them out…Brad Setser says that in this month, the Federal Reserve has outlaid some $370 billion to backstop all these failures.

When you’ve got ordinary, everyday mommy bloggers posting that they wonder if they should be pulling thousands of dollars out of their bank accounts, “just in case”…Well, let’s just say it adds up to a serious loss of confidence in the financial system.

Dudes.  Get testy all you want.  But please, please give some serious thought to what you’ll do if you’re the one to walk into the Oval Office next January.

There are currently 5 responses to “My!”

  1. 1 On September 27th, 2008, preTzel said:

    What scares me is people making runs on their banks to begin pulling out thousands and thousands of dollars - then what happens? And how can they be FDIC insured if the FDIC is busying bailing out all these other places? It makes my head spin and right now I hope some miracle happens to turn all of this around and fast.

  2. 2 On September 27th, 2008, you know where you are with said:

    I’m too far from retirement to be pulling funds. I’d be more worried if I had short-term need for that money.

    And I thought that O wasn’t testy enough. He needs a little “Hoo-Hah!” apparently. And, given McSmirk’s body language, maybe O needs to stop looking at his opponent as they debate. Apparently, never once looking at your opponent means you’re tough.

  3. 3 On September 27th, 2008, Blog Antagonist said:

    I can’t say that the debate really underscored my confidence in either one of them. It just made me more ambivalent. Though I am loathe say it, I do have to give McCain points for his oration skills. I think he was more poised and polished.

    The bank mess? The more I try to make sense of it, the more confused I get. But years ago when all this subprime lending crap started, and Fannie Mae started giving out loans to anyone who had two nickels to rub together, anybody with half a brain could see that it was going to come to no good.

    So why are we now facing the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression? If someone could give me a clear and concise answer on that, I would be amazingly grateful.

  4. 4 On September 27th, 2008, noreen said:

    Whatever McCain said it was in such a whiny voice I had to put my hands over my ears. Obama had a much more polished delivery. But then I began to wonder, do we put too much stock in these “debates” which are not really true debates?

  5. 5 On September 27th, 2008, Lisa said:

    As usual, I agree wholeheartedly. I was SUPREMELY disappointed to hear that Obama didn’t really have a solution to the financial crisis. I was and still am a diehard Obama supporter, but that was his chance! He could have really shown us something new, something different — I really hoped he would have an FDR moment and lay out a brilliant scheme to fix this mess. Ugh. I was pretty much on the edge of my seat the whole night, waiting for the real meat of both of their platforms to come out, but I felt like it never did, sadly. I’m waiting for the next one to be blown away.

Leave a Reply