11th March 2008

Studying the question

posted in News, Pop Culture, School, Science, Socializing |

Gazing back into those misty, halcyon days of college, I dimly seem to remember something called "study groups".  At the beginning of the semester (or quarter), you’d collect names and phone numbers of other folks in your class who were interested in studying together, then you’d set a time, and someone would be tagged as the person to glom onto the first good study room or carrel at the university library.  You’d meet, everyone would have their textbooks and class notes, someone would bring noshes, and you’d spend a few hours going over the notes and exchanging answers and ideas about the homework.

"Y’know, I tried number 48, but I kept getting hung up!  Did anyone figure that problem out?!"

In my Numeric Analysis class (one of my favorites, really!), our prof gave us take-home tests for the mid-term and final.  He fully expected us to work in groups.  They were some of the hardest–and most fun–exams I had in my college experience.  Our study group met for hours in the library, in the break room in the basement of the math building, out on the lawns.  We worked hard.  We worked our butts off.  We thought deeply.  My mid-term response was 20 pages long; my final response was 30 pages.

We also had classes where it was probably assumed by the professor that we were working alone on homework and studying.  But even in those cases, hammering out the answers to more difficult problems with other students helped all of us understand the basic concepts better.  And those who got answers easily explained to those who didn’t, and gained from that aspect as well.

These days, it seems, such study groups often convene on the intertubes.  Specifically, at places such as Facebook.

One professor at Ryerson University, who apparently had a requirement that students were to work on assignments alone, discovered that a student had set up a Facebook study group for his class.  That student is facing expulsion and 147 counts of academic misconduct, one for each member of the study group.  His B grade was changed to an F by his professor after the Facebook group was discovered.

So many different ways of looking at this.

The professor didn’t want students working out answers to problems together. 

If that is the sole issue here, why weren’t all the other members of the study group equally penalized?  Why didn’t every student who was a member of the online group have his or her grades reduced/revoked?

As I understand it, each student was assigned different questions; since they were all different, was requesting help cheating?  Is the requirement to work on homework assignments alone a good requirement or a bad one?  Do students learn better by sweating through the problems on their own, or by helping each other find ways to reach the solution?

Different students respond in different ways to different approaches.  Some students do not like to work in groups at all.  Some students like to work in groups for some classes, but not others.  Some students work in groups all the time.  Some students work in groups to get off easily–but how does that help them when it’s time to take a test?  Some students who work in groups learn that they do all the work and others take the credit.  Some students learn better through reading, some through working through problems on their own, some through discussing, some through teaching others.

Questions of pedagogical approach aside, there are those who think that in this case it’s an open-and-shut case of cheating.  Others say that no-one posted specific answers to any problems and that mostly it was an ongoing session of tips and tricks on how to approach the problems. 

One blogger said that someone knowing they were getting the wrong answer indicates that they were cheating, because otherwise how would they know the answer was wrong?  Well, hell, I could always tell when I was getting the answer wrong–because nothing would check out when I worked the problem backwards.  Or else it just "felt" wrong.

I don’t know.  I think requiring college/university students to work alone on homework assignments is not the best approach; I think that by that age the student knows whether s/he wants to collaborate or work alone.  I also feel that the students who are actually getting specific answers from others without doing any of the work are cheating mostly themselves.  They’re the ones who will end up doing poorly on quizzes and tests.  They’re the ones who won’t be able to do the basic work when they get into a more advanced course.  They’re the ones who will constantly be scrambling to keep up or cover up as they move into the workforce.

What say you?

For a very spirited discussion on this subject, from both sides, check out The So-Called Facebook Scandal at A Blog Around The Clock.

There are currently 6 responses to “Studying the question”

  1. 1 On March 12th, 2008, Johnny said:

    In Engineering classes, we had a set of unofficial rules of ethics when it came to study groups. But, you had to feel each other out - without insinuating that the other person wanted to be a cheater. The rule was, as I practiced with my lab partners, when you had homework, you could read out answers to long equations to each other on the phone. But, you couldn’t discussed HOW you got to those equations. So, the answer-only method was a double-check that your answers were right. And if they weren’t then each of you had to go and double-check your work to see where one of you went wrong.

    But, not all followed this rule. It’s a fuzzy area.

  2. 2 On March 12th, 2008, Vinegar Martinis said:

    That’s ridiculous. Once those students enter the real work world, are they not going to have conference calls and meetings where collaboration is a part of their daily environment?

    Gad what a moron!

  3. 3 On March 12th, 2008, gh1f said:

    Students learn a lot from each other when they work on problems together. My attitude is that students should be encouraged to work together because doing helps their learning. But then the students need to know that if they do not do the work, or learn the material themselves, then they probably will not pass the exams. Each student is responsible for their own knowledge. As a consequence, I don’t think homework grades should count for much.

    So I agree with you.

    But if the rule says no working together with the student students knowing the rule up front, and the school has an academic code about such things, then the facebook site is academic cheating.

    Exactly what are we learning about the student when the student sets up a facebook site to do this knowing the rules?

  4. 4 On March 12th, 2008, Elaine said:

    I think you are right - working together is a good thing to learn to do. And, yes, if they’re slacking and cheating through study groups that will show up in their exams. I’ve always told my students that they should feel free to study together, to talk about material with each other and to (gasp) learn from each other. But then again, I teach religion where ‘correct’ answers are a bit more elusive than in math or engineering.
    That all said, however, if a professor specifically requires students to work alone, then the facebook thing was a violation of the requirement. The problem, from my perspective, would be the ‘work alone’ requirement and if I were that professor’s dean, I might have some words with him. But yeah, the kid did violate the rules.

  5. 5 On March 13th, 2008, jouette said:

    what on earth is the world coming to? sheesh.

  6. 6 On March 13th, 2008, GrannyJ said:

    Curious — the idea of group study never occurred to me! In fact, I don’t think it was in the air when I was in school, oh so many years ago. But then, Mom drilled into me the idea of originality, meaning do your own thing (and it better be good, BTW). As a result, I think I would have been too competitive to study well with others. Now that I am a Revered Elder, I see nothing wrong with the idea, especially when the subject is a tough upperclass math course.

Leave a Reply