25th May 2007

I am a squishy liberal

posted in Uncategorized |

I am a perpetrator of all that is wrong and horrible with society today.

Yes, you heard me right.

What brings this up?  The story in the previous post, and the comments on the newspaper’s website about it.

Let’s see…My sins:

I don’t think CPS should remove the child because of his (obviously) neglectful mother.  OMG, the child was out of her sight!!  For an entire MINUTE!!!  Give me a fuckin’ break.  First off, any parent who claims that they never, ever took their eyes off their child/ren at that age is automatically chalked up as a boastful liar in my books.  Secondly, there’s “keeping an eye on the kiddo” and there’s “keeping an eye on the kiddo”; I have quite often gone into stores and done my business, with a general knowledge of where the dotter is (sort of keeping her in the corner of my eye).  Not aware every second of what she is doing, but being aware of where she is in such a way that if (when) she disappears, I immediately have a little alert bell go off in my head.

I don’t think the child should be whipped, beaten, spanked, or dragged through the streets with tar and feathers.  Nor do I think he’s destined to be a high-school dropout serving burgers at Burger King.  Nor do I think he’s going to be a felon when he grows up.  Nor do I think he’s inherently destructive and he’ll never appreciate anything beautiful in his life.  Fer cryin’ out loud, folks.  He looks to be two years old.  Two.  The only time my two-year-old appreciated “beauty” or the concept of “leaving things alone” was when it was something that was hers.  I can practically guarantee you that if I had hurried past a heap of colorful sand like that with the dotter in tow at that age, she, too, would have done her damndest to play with it.  She wouldn’t have dragged her feet through it, either–she’d have plopped right down in the middle of it and started running her fingers through it, lovingly creating multi-colored sandhills and turning it into a thoroughly slurgy monochromatic mess.  Then, she would have insisted that I admire it.

I don’t even think the mom should be pilloried for “running away”–mainly because I don’t think the mom really noticed.  She marched in, kiddo running after her, did her stuff at the post office, and marched out again, grabbing kiddo on the way.  (This relates to “he was out of her sight!”–she obviously knew where he was, because she didn’t stop and look around and worry, she went right over to him on her way out.)  She looked busy and unobservant, like her mind was on other things.  When I’m busy and my mind is on other things, I don’t observe my environment all that clearly…after all, I can drive to work on autopilot, and not even remember leaving the house.  (I can also not even remember to bring my purse, but that’s another post entirely.)

Amazingly enough, when I watched the video, I wasn’t immediately aware that the woman was on welfare.  That she was popping out kids left and right.  That her behavior was an indictment of society today.  That she and her kid were a blot on humanity.

See?  A squishy liberal–that’s me.

If I were a right-thinking upright and moral human being, I would know all those things, just by viewing that video.

I hang my head in shame.

Now, I will admit, if my dotter had done that at age two and I did notice what was going on, I’d have been utterly and completely mortified, and, depending on my state of mind at the time would either have had a long talk with the child at the scene of the crime or else had a little screech-fest.  

In all honesty, I can totally imagine being off in my own little world to the point where I wouldn’t notice, completely oblivious.  I’d find out about it by reading the morning paper and watching that videotape.  And then I’d be utterly and completely mortified and afraid to stick my head out the door.

If the kid were older–say four or five–then I’d be more charitable with the commentary on Super-Destructo and his ultimate fate.  But at two?  Hell, most kids are barely able to follow two-step directions at the age of two, let alone grasp the concept of stanchions marking a boundary and pretty sand not being a plaything.  (My mom is going to email me and tell me I was a genius saint at that age and would never, ever have done something like that.  She might have a point–but that’s because I was repressed.  Ask all her friends.)

There are currently 8 responses to “I am a squishy liberal”

  1. 1 On May 25th, 2007, Spacemom said:

    Apparently, so am I.

    I watched the video. I agreed with you. The mom looked like she was in a hurry.

    The comments reminded me of Monday. I took my girls (4.8 and 2.9) to the postoffice. I had 4 packages that HAD to get out. They looked at the items over at the wall while I waited in line. At one point, the 4.8 ran and the balloon on her arm hit a woman. I apologized, I had her apologize, yet the man in front of me (who cut in front of me) gave us the dirtiest look on the planet….
    Some people just think that kids should be seen and not heard. Period.

  2. 2 On May 25th, 2007, Julie Pippert said:

    How funny!

    Great minds must think alike indeed because I thought the SAME things as you!

  3. 3 On May 25th, 2007, D said:

    Ok, so I’m a liberal as well… does this reduce my chances when I apply for citizenship?

  4. 4 On May 25th, 2007, Julie Pippert said:

    I quoted and linked and shamelesly spun off my own post from you. :)

  5. 5 On May 25th, 2007, kate said:

    I’m sure you also didn’t realize immediately that this is a FATHERLESS CHILD. I mean, it’s so obvious.

    *ow* Sprained an eyeball from the rolling.

  6. 6 On May 25th, 2007, GrannyJ said:

    A genius saint at 2??? Huh??? The only individual who ever called you repressed that I recall was the Hyde Park pediatrician who thought you were repressed because you didn’t tear his waiting room apart. (FYI to those who are unaware: Hyde Park is the home to zillions of super-permissive Univ. of Chicago ultra-liberals.) Also, you committed the unpardonable sin of putting your arm out for a shot because I did & you were simply copying me. Fer heavens’ sake, you were even permitted tantrums — as long as you did them in your own space and not ours.

  7. 7 On May 25th, 2007, GrannyJ said:

    What I didn’t mention in the previous post is that I figured the reason you didn’t tear the place apart is that you were bright kid who was casing the joint before proceeding to do whatever.

  8. 8 On May 26th, 2007, Linda G said:

    Although I am consertive by party and nature, as the mother of four and grandmother to eight children, whth a great grandchild due to be born in September, I too sympathize and relate to the Mom in the vidio. This seems to be, as my old Gran used to say, “a tempest in a teapot.” Another great, old saying was “kids will be kids.” The Monks seem to feel that in the great scheme of things, the incident was trivial indeed.
    What I find a bit scary is realizing that, as we go about our daily business, each of our lives is recorded for the potential scrutiny, critique, and disection by others across the globe.

Leave a Reply